Forum Thread

let me make it simple and clear.

one unreturned favour of someone would come back to us in the form of powerorbs

basically, if i had 100 interactions to be made by someone, it would be converted into powerorbs depending on how many exp. shares a person has.


Edit:-

Quote from MeepTheMareep02

Explanation for anyone confused
This suggestion suggests that you should get bonus powerorbs if you make interactions but do not get them back
Support, but there should be a limit on the number of interactions that count, else people who make 30k clicks that are mostly storage box clicks (rather than egg clicks) are basically getting powerorbs twice

Well, as suggested by Mareep, I'll take the max. Limit of getting the powerorbs from those unreturned interactions by the specific users as 30k :)

---

Thread has received Mod approval and is now open for discussion.

---

Explanation for anyone confused
This suggestion suggests that you should get bonus powerorbs if you make interactions but do not get them back

---

Support, but there should be a limit on the number of interactions that count, else people who make 30k clicks that are mostly storage box clicks (rather than egg clicks) are basically getting powerorbs twice. Actually, maybe this could be limited to egg clicks

ah, I needed to reread it like 5 times and I still didn't get it.
Thanks Meep

---

I like this idea

I like it but i dont think the rate should be too high...maybe 1 for 25 or something...or maybe 30 (since the limit is 30k so you get 1k extra powerorbs) and it would be rounded up from 10 onwards. For example, if you get 100 unreturns, you get 4 powerorbs. But honestly, idk if that is even worth the effort, exept for giving us more options for special days. But it still makes no sense, people would just click banned players or players who havent played in many years. Its is a good idea but i cant figure out a good way to make the realilty worth it or make sense. I know someone who has played for a year and just recently got the exp share device...im on the fence with the idea becquse it seems noth good and bad...maybe think it through some more and update again. This needs more fleshing out. 😕

---