Forum Thread
Advertising with no definite proof
Forum-Index → Help → Answered → Advertising with no definite proofFor Example, if you were checking for the First OS Shiny Bulbasaur and you had the Pokemon ID of 6, but someone else has a Shiny Bulbasaur with the Pokemon ID of 4, that would mean the other person's Shiny Bulbasaur would technically be first on site.
Also, the PokéHeroes Book of Records has a list of First OS and everything, though it hasn't been updated that I can tell in a while.
Yeah, I've been curious about my retro, but there is a much more practical dilemma to buyers and sellers behind this question. It's something I've been wondering about for awhile now, to be honest.
Also, the id method doesn't cover Pokemon who have been deleted off of the system? What if the first Pokemon on the site ended up being deleted later on, whether accidentally or intentionally? So the claim, in all practical aspects, is the first Pokemon on the site that hasn't been deleted off the site.
I suppose one could look at the date that the Pokemon was obtained, but with the Pokemon being this old, it doesn't count the hours since the Pokemon was obtained. And I happen to know when the retro was released on the site down to the day / approximate hour. "3 Months and 27 Days ago" about an hour or less within the release date at reset. But this is my own Pokemon, and it narrows it down considerably. But going back to the Pokemon that is on GTS, I'm not completely sure of what date and year the Pokemon was released on. It's definitely not this year's Halloween event since the new event Pokemon is Marshadow. I suppose I can look the release date up on the wiki... but not all the Pokemon are on the wiki with their release dates. Suppose it isn't an event Pokemon. Suppose it was something like a shiny Floette and that it isn't in the records thread at all. That Pokemon isn't in the wiki, and there is no easy access to the information as far as when it was released. So one would be going through a lot of ids blindly just to find that out.
Anyways, I'm tired and probably rambling on and on by now, whether coherently or not. I've been curious.