Log In
Interaction Multiplier IconGround Weather Castform Don't have an account yet? Register now!
.

Forum Thread

Auction House Recommended Price

Forum-Index Suggestions Implemented Auction House Recommended Price
Pleiadesu
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 37

Forum Posts: 1,222
Posted: Mon, 28/12/2015 04:51 (8 Years ago)
What I'm suggesting is something like the 'recommended price' feature of the Berry Market, except for the Auction House.
It could either be a suggestion as to what price might draw the most bidders, or a hard upper limit to how much you can price it at. Items could add to the upper limit.
Since some people won't be needing this feature, if it's a hard limit there should be a switch in the Misc. Settings.

Price values could either be taken from the average price of that pokemon as seen in the Auction House or taken from another source (such as the Price Check thread)

Example:
Pony
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 27

Forum Posts: 264
Posted: Mon, 28/12/2015 04:57 (8 Years ago)
I would agree, but it would be hard to price every Pokemon. And if it would count for items, that'll be even harder! Sure, it could be done... but it would take a while with 700+ and event Pokemon plus items...

Nope.

But without these limitations, this feature would be great!


pls pet pony
Pleiadesu
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 37

Forum Posts: 1,222
Posted: Mon, 28/12/2015 05:11 (8 Years ago)
I was thinking of user-submitted prices, but any system that involves user-submitted data for something like this is bound to fail at some time.
I was also thinking of levels being included in the price (such as 100~200, 300~400, etc. levels having different prices) but that'd be too much.
The items feature would be easier, since there aren't (relatively) many items that can be given to a pokemon and the items are sorted by categories in the Item Bag already, which might help with pricing. Besides, it already semi-exists as the price option in the Item Shop and the Delibird Item Delivery system.
So the only reliable method of pricing would be the Price Check thread, but then it would be pointless as the thread is already there.

Edit: Actually, a user-submitted vote-like system might actually work. Except that there would need to be a person to approve a certain price, and I'm pretty sure the mods have enough work already.
Rage || More rage || Ultimate rage
"Don't let someone else make you feel guilty or ashamed about something you don't have control over, whether it is your skin color, your sexual preference or otherwise."
- Alex Bolton (I Hate Everything)
Pony
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 27

Forum Posts: 264
Posted: Mon, 28/12/2015 06:12 (8 Years ago)
Yeah actually didn't think of DID ;-;

Now that you stated the idea clearly, yeah, seems great! Although I still think it will take a long time.
(maybe price Pokemon by rarity?)

Yes, I do think levels would be too complex to add, but what if there was a Ponyta at lv1 and another at lv120 at the same price? This is a hard problem to work around ;-;




pls pet pony
Pleiadesu
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 37

Forum Posts: 1,222
Posted: Mon, 28/12/2015 06:13 (8 Years ago)
The code wouldn't be too complex, but my worry is the server load it would cause from collecting data. Considering the fact that there are countless auctions going on right now and the statistics would need to be updated at a regular basis, this idea might be a little too big.
I hope not, anyway.
Rage || More rage || Ultimate rage
"Don't let someone else make you feel guilty or ashamed about something you don't have control over, whether it is your skin color, your sexual preference or otherwise."
- Alex Bolton (I Hate Everything)
Pony
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 27

Forum Posts: 264
Posted: Mon, 28/12/2015 06:20 (8 Years ago)
Hmm.. maybe there could be multiple Auction House "severs".

My idea is that each user is evenly assigned an Auction House "server". The sever would only load for the user's selected server, so this could reduce lag.

Certain trades would not show up, though, meaning arranged trades between users would be hard!



pls pet pony
Pleiadesu
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 37

Forum Posts: 1,222
Posted: Mon, 28/12/2015 06:23 (8 Years ago)
That would solve the problem, but it also creates another one.
Servers are rather costly to maintain, especially if used as regularly as the existing Auction House.
Perhaps around 3 or 4 servers with a certain amount of users designated to one might work, though it would still be a bit slow.
Rage || More rage || Ultimate rage
"Don't let someone else make you feel guilty or ashamed about something you don't have control over, whether it is your skin color, your sexual preference or otherwise."
- Alex Bolton (I Hate Everything)
Pony
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 27

Forum Posts: 264
Posted: Mon, 28/12/2015 06:37 (8 Years ago)
Erm... get nbn One way around this is to make more people buy premuim.

Another is to put more inactive users on a sever. They go online much less then active users and you can put more of them on a server because they won't auction much, therefore the site would have less servers, therefore reducing cost!

*pants Presto!


pls pet pony
Pleiadesu
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 37

Forum Posts: 1,222
Posted: Mon, 28/12/2015 06:40 (8 Years ago)
Or there could be just one more server with the bot running across and collecting data, since the AH works fine the way it is right now.
I'm confident the bot method would work, since it's been a huge success on Wikipedia, but then they have a huge server bank xP
Rage || More rage || Ultimate rage
"Don't let someone else make you feel guilty or ashamed about something you don't have control over, whether it is your skin color, your sexual preference or otherwise."
- Alex Bolton (I Hate Everything)
Pony
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 27

Forum Posts: 264
Posted: Mon, 28/12/2015 06:44 (8 Years ago)
well they're a wiki.

Yeah, that bot method seems pretty good! It won't cost too much for an extra server, plus it makes the AH more faster! (without loney AH severs)


pls pet pony