Forum Thread
Gems from pokemon releacing
Forum-Index → Suggestions → Rejected → Gems from pokemon releacingThe idea is based on - well when we releace pokemon we get nothing and it goes nowhere why don't we use this in out favor-
For example :
We releace a caterpie its a bug type :
You succesfully releaced caterpie into the wild.. The pokemon left 1 bug gems behind
This way we don't just trow our pokemons away into nowhere.. i think its a good idea and in this case some gems wont be so expensive like 45k per gem like the dragon and if you are lucky .. wich in my opinion is way way overpricing .. Well lets heear it folks what do you think???
Ofc it will affect price of mega stone but also all pokemons so game will start to be to easy and Staff members cant add so much new things to site.
And even if i like you sorry but no support from me.
You were talking about Caterpie which is an exclusive Bug Type Pokémon but what about Weedle which is Bug/Poison Pokémon ?
I know you said :
But you would get one to four gems per type or just for one of them ?
How many times you'll be able to that ? Will it be per day ?
Because if you don't put a limit on it, people will start hunting an specific type of Pokémon just to get the gems of it and sell it , to use on the Gem Cauldron/Gem Exchange or to shiny hunt.
And how about the Dragons gems ? Truly the most desired and expensive gems in game.
The chances of getting them would be the same for the others or would it be harder to obtain ?
Once again, implementing such feature wouldn't just interfere on the price of the gems but on the hunts which are made to not be that easy to complete.
I'm sorry but I don't support this suggestion.
If the value of gems drop, so will the value of many items, such as mega stones.
Then it would be totally unfair to the users who got like 10 megas, because they have spent so much money on them, and have given so much effort to look for mega stones for them.
Yes, it would be easier for us to get gems to use if this suggestion is implemented, but I think this suggestion will cause too much problems with the value of many items. And most of all, I think it would be unfair to the users who already spent so much money on buying gems.
Another idea might be that rather than getting an actual gem, you get something (maybe a gem shard, or whatever) that isn't tradable, but the gem collecter would accept for eggs. That would stop it from ruining the economy while still helping with some of the harder hunts.
Total votes: 60
Support ratio: 58%
Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!