Log In
Steel Weather Castform Don't have an account yet? Register now!
.

Forum Thread

Gems from pokemon releacing

Forum-Index → Suggestions → Rejected → Gems from pokemon releacing
CrazyChaosQueen
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 49

Forum Posts: 141
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 00:45 (9 Years ago)
Hey i just came up with this idea:

The idea is based on - well when we releace pokemon we get nothing and it goes nowhere why don't we use this in out favor-

For example :
We releace a caterpie its a bug type :

You succesfully releaced caterpie into the wild.. The pokemon left 1 bug gems behind

This way we don't just trow our pokemons away into nowhere.. i think its a good idea and in this case some gems wont be so expensive like 45k per gem like the dragon and if you are lucky .. wich in my opinion is way way overpricing .. Well lets heear it folks what do you think???
JudJud
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 38

Forum Posts: 247
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 00:48 (9 Years ago)
People would start Shiny hunting Deino xD but I believe released Pokemon go into the Lab and Tall Grass :3



CrazyChaosQueen
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 49

Forum Posts: 141
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 00:48 (9 Years ago)
i mean not every pokemon to give gems but least 1:10 to give 1-4 gems
Deletionstation
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 32

Forum Posts: 52
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 00:52 (9 Years ago)
so if I got this right, every time you would release a pokemon, you get a chance of getting their type of gems?
CrazyChaosQueen
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 49

Forum Posts: 141
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 00:53 (9 Years ago)
well the chance will be for example 1 out of 10 to leave a 1-4 gems yeah thats my idea
Dokku
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 100

Forum Posts: 592
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 00:53 (9 Years ago)
Well nice idea but for me gems will lose they worth so hard. All shiny hunts will start to be so easy + way to easy to get kalos legends, or other pokemon from gem collector like kanto birds or Ditto

Ofc it will affect price of mega stone but also all pokemons so game will start to be to easy and Staff members cant add so much new things to site.

And even if i like you sorry but no support from me.

CrazyChaosQueen
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 49

Forum Posts: 141
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 00:54 (9 Years ago)
make the chance 1-1k to earn a gem then its just an idea -- make it harder but in this way we have a little chance to earn something
Gabe
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 47

Forum Posts: 362
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 01:11 (9 Years ago)
The idea is good but I think the fact that when you release a Pokémon you can a certain gem, would decrease it's value and make things easier.
You were talking about Caterpie which is an exclusive Bug Type Pokémon but what about Weedle which is Bug/Poison Pokémon ?
I know you said :

Quotewell the chance will be for example 1 out of 10 to leave a 1-4 gems yeah thats my idea


But you would get one to four gems per type or just for one of them ?
How many times you'll be able to that ? Will it be per day ?
Because if you don't put a limit on it, people will start hunting an specific type of Pokémon just to get the gems of it and sell it , to use on the Gem Cauldron/Gem Exchange or to shiny hunt.
And how about the Dragons gems ? Truly the most desired and expensive gems in game.
The chances of getting them would be the same for the others or would it be harder to obtain ?

Once again, implementing such feature wouldn't just interfere on the price of the gems but on the hunts which are made to not be that easy to complete.

I'm sorry but I don't support this suggestion.
Patcool
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 14

Forum Posts: 3
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 05:43 (9 Years ago)
It should be depending on the pokemon you release then you have a certain chance to get the gem of that type but if it's like Bug, Fairy, or Dragon then it should be a VERY RARE chance since you can't get them through rumble missions. Ex. You released a Squirtle then you have like a 1/8 chance of a water gem. But if you release a Blastoise then you have a 1/4 chance to get a gem or two.
Shedinja
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 45

Forum Posts: 433
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 06:29 (9 Years ago)
No support
Lets be honest:Getting a rewars for getting rid of your pokemon?Thats no fair!:/
User
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 81

Forum Posts: 552
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 07:10 (9 Years ago)
I don't really support this idea because if this suggestion is implemented, the value of gems would get really really cheap.
If the value of gems drop, so will the value of many items, such as mega stones.
Then it would be totally unfair to the users who got like 10 megas, because they have spent so much money on them, and have given so much effort to look for mega stones for them.

Yes, it would be easier for us to get gems to use if this suggestion is implemented, but I think this suggestion will cause too much problems with the value of many items. And most of all, I think it would be unfair to the users who already spent so much money on buying gems.
Itachikage
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 55

Forum Posts: 81
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 18:33 (9 Years ago)
The only problem with it I can see is that players with millions of game chips will just buy up dritini eggs, hatch them, and release. that would cause the price of dragon gems to crash. If the chance of gettign dragon (or other rare) gems is greatly decreased, than I could see it being viable, but as is, it wouldn't really work too well.

Another idea might be that rather than getting an actual gem, you get something (maybe a gem shard, or whatever) that isn't tradable, but the gem collecter would accept for eggs. That would stop it from ruining the economy while still helping with some of the harder hunts.

Rhythm
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 55

Forum Posts: 539
Posted: Mon, 05/01/2015 19:16 (9 Years ago)
I would support this usually but, you see, it would afect the whole baloane of PH. It would be way too easy to hunt Dragon Pokemon and make Boilings and getting Kalos Legemds and and legendary birds and Ditto so :b

Quote"Everyone has their own little internal world - a secret garden only they can enter. Each world follows its own internal logic - individuality. And the logic of one world means nothing in another. Understanding other people isn't hard... It's impossible."
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Wed, 07/01/2015 03:34 (9 Years ago)
No support,reasons already stated

I have a box full of Sevipers,and if I release them all I would get 100 poison gems in one click.
Seriously,what is that? .-.
Adder
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 25

Forum Posts: 75
Posted: Sun, 11/01/2015 07:07 (9 Years ago)
it's... sort of a good idea, but other than those reasons, what if someone were to release 100 dragon pokemon, got lucky and got a gem for each one and another person released 1000 dragon pokemon and didn't get a single gem. That's the problem with basing things on chance, hard working people might not get their fair reward. i honestly think it should be based on level, say 1000 levels to one gem. but for pokemon with 2 types it would be a 50:50 chance of getting the one gem of either type that way you would not get 2 gems per 1000 levels. this way it would not significantly lower the worth of more expensive gems, (and i doubt anyone would train a level 1000 magikarp for one water gem) this way hard workers will be equally rewarded. p.s the message for this could be something like "as you release ********* his power was transformed into 1 ****** gem" so that's my idea but i don't have support for the current proposal.
~Ash~
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 27

Forum Posts: 86
Posted: Tue, 10/03/2015 09:35 (9 Years ago)
This would make gems very cheap....
And Also..
People will adopt Homeless pokemons and abandon them....again
Only for some items!


vanillite1
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 51

Forum Posts: 815
Posted: Tue, 10/03/2015 09:36 (9 Years ago)
no support the price of gems will drastically drop i can just remove my whole trade box to get hundreads of gems

trying to get it on ranklist so plz interact with it
CatLady
ONLINE
Trainerlevel: 104

Forum Posts: 8,611
Posted: Sat, 27/06/2020 11:33 (4 Years ago)
This suggestion has received less than 60% support and was moved to rejected.

Total votes: 60
Support ratio: 58%
Credits for avatar to ~Cookie~

Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!